2021-04-01 - NLnet supports Babelia

I am happy to announce that nlnet supports Babelia.

I am very pleased with the financial support, but even more so about the recognition of my past work, I have been working on this for 10 years, and the immediate efforts on Babelia.

That is the occasion to share rationales, the roadmap I devised for 10 months, and some technical notes.

Why a search engine?

TL;DR: I can do better than Google.

Search has been an essential part of knowledge acquisition from the dawn of time. It is even more prevalent today because it is more accessible than ever before. Most people have access to a large amount of knowledge thanks to privateer (sometime wanna-be privacy-friendly) search engines.

Here is what problems my search engine will solve compared to existing search engines:

One thing I will not claim is that it will eliminate the filter bubble. In a way that is a similar situation to the fediverse: a self-hosted or community search engine will entice some kind of filter bubble because of confirmation bias such as "The results of that instance are good, hence all results are good", or such as "I agree with the results, so all results are truthy". Also, because of unknown unknowns. In any case, it will be, like today, the responsability (and duty) of any fediverse citizen (fedizen) to cross-check results, and likely escape the gilded cage they constructed for themself, and their community.

What I can claim is the following: there will be more search engines, with more diversity, and hopefully expert instances that are curated fairly.

I build a search engine because that is apparantly the most difficult software that can be built.

To summarize "why a search engine" boil down to a) the current situation can be improved, b) I can do better, c) I want my own search engine.

Why not an existing FLOSS search engine?

TL;DR: There is none.

Even if some software might qualify as "search engine", the bare minimal requirement is that they should be written in an easy to the mind programming language such as Python or... Scheme.

Also, I have added non-biased constraint features such as easy to setup, run, and maintain, that disqualify all other thinkable software or set of software.

NB: I plan to out-perform solutions based on ElasticSearch such as commonsearch.

NB: Recently, on my side, Google search started to group results for things such as StackOverflow, reddit, Quora and whatnots. Since a couple of weeks, for some reason, Google started to try to present more diverse set of results. Maybe they hope that it will bring back the 1990 era of geocities, or the era before they killed feed readers, eventually improving organically Google search, because Google algorithms can not figure that almost anything about software outside StackOverflow is subpar, and it particular it can not figure what is a good page. Google wants to tackle the problem of centralization...

NB: At some point, searching for simhash was yielding three mirrors of wikipedia's page entitled simhash, those websites were setup by black hats to capture ad clicks.

NB: I wrote down the above story to be able to drop: Google quacks!

Why will I succeed where others have failed?

TL;DR: Maybe I will fail. Maybe I will succeed, I worked a lot for that, and made choices.

First, there is always a chance or evil luck that I will fail.

Outside the very top notch high world-class level of self-esteem ego I have, there are several source of confidence:

Babelia seek to eliminate the need for Google, and down the road even deliver better tooling that any wanna-be unicorn... Babelia does not play by the same rules. Babelia will not consider that the user is stupid. Babelia is FLOSS, that alone will be enough to get rid of Google. It will also be part of the fediverse. And further in the future the basis of a fully decentralized Internet at the application level

NB: By the way, I believe Google's search engine is already built around the idea of a federation, except it happens in a controled environment. So, what Babelia will achieve is more difficult that what Google try to do (and arguably sometime succeed).

NB: I do not know why Cliqz failed or even Qwant did not succeed. I may find out.

Really, why a search engine?

TL;DR: Star-system is the limit, Facebook and GitHub are next.

The search engine is gathering place, like a library. I like to think Google is the modern incarnation of the Library of Alexandria. There is also Wikimedia projects. I mean, having loads of books without a way to find out the book you are interested in is not useful to have.

In my opinion, a search engine is a fundamental piece in a knowledge construction.

What about wikipedia, wikidata or other wiki stuff, or Facebook, or even GitHub? Those things are more social than a search engine: a registry, a filling cabinet can be automated, whereas decyphering mushrooms caps, and categorizing into species, as of yet, can not be automated so much.

Another fundamental piece in knowledge construction is communication.

To improve upon the establishment, and established practices, my goal is to mimick the world wide web distribution model (easy updates, and the long gone view-source), and getting inspiration from GNU/Linux distributions (network of trust), with the far-reaching perfection and/or minimalism dedication of projects such as suckless, netbsd, or... R7RS.

The idea is to build a desktop environment that stems around a decentralized (publicly distributed) code space where you can stream updates from a network of friends. No, Bill Gates is not your friend.

Yes, the basis of the desktop environment will be a networked programming language. It will not be networked in the sense of Erlang.

Unlike anthropocene desktop environment, it will not try to hide programming from you. It should be painless to share your tweaks, scripts or programs into the public network. The best and still wanna-be feature is easier internationalization (i18n) of code. Footnote: Clickports will be available.

Code is a meme. Where you can share codes, you can share memes. The inverse is not always true. I experimented with a peer-to-peer social network with qadom. While, it is incomplete, it allowed me to figure that it is not impossible, there might be hidden corners, tho.

To summarize: Other aspects of the Internet are more social than a search engine. To deliver the features that can compete with Facebook, GitHub while sticking to demonstrated good pratices such as network of trust, the way forward is to build a desktop environement that is built around a programming language that embody, in world made of diversity, the social nature of software making. Being able to share code as easily as sharing cat memes, and being able to download those memes, after a review, and possibly some tweaks, install them in your own desktop is: the next big thing.


Back to the more prosaic roadmap toward the release of Babelia 1.0:


A few notes about the design of the whole thing:

You might ask: I am not a coder, what is in there for me? In that case re-read the above, and send me an email with a precise description of what the above is missing.

NB: I plan to deliver before rustaceans start to consider coding software that are not command-line helpers.