I am happy to announce that nlnet supports Babelia.
I am very pleased with the financial support, but even more so about the recognition of my past work, I have been working on this for 10 years, and the immediate efforts on Babelia.
That is the occasion to share rationales, the roadmap I devised for 10 months, and some technical notes.
TL;DR: I can do better than Google.
Search has been an essential part of knowledge acquisition from the dawn of time. It is even more prevalent today because it is more accessible than ever before. Most people have access to a large amount of knowledge thanks to privateer (sometime wanna-be privacy-friendly) search engines.
Here is what problems my search engine will solve compared to existing search engines:
Free and open search engine that anybody will be free to study, fork, and run;
Hence, it will not be under the control of a single (possibly selfish) group. People will be able to tweak it, even without programming knowledge thanks to full control over the crawler, with control over the knowledge base and with the help of the moderation tools;
It will not be privacy-friendly wann-be: the source code will be available for anybody to check any privacy claim I make;
It may yield more interesting results;
One thing I will not claim is that it will eliminate the filter bubble. In a way that is a similar situation to the fediverse: a self-hosted or community search engine will entice some kind of filter bubble because of confirmation bias such as "The results of that instance are good, hence all results are good", or such as "I agree with the results, so all results are truthy". Also, because of unknown unknowns. In any case, it will be, like today, the responsability (and duty) of any fediverse citizen (fedizen) to cross-check results, and likely escape the gilded cage they constructed for themself, and their community.
What I can claim is the following: there will be more search engines, with more diversity, and hopefully expert instances that are curated fairly.
I build a search engine because that is apparantly the most difficult software that can be built.
To summarize "why a search engine" boil down to a) the current situation can be improved, b) I can do better, c) I want my own search engine.
TL;DR: There is none.
Even if some software might qualify as "search engine", the bare minimal requirement is that they should be written in an easy to the mind programming language such as Python or... Scheme.
Also, I have added non-biased constraint features such as easy to setup, run, and maintain, that disqualify all other thinkable software or set of software.
NB: I plan to out-perform solutions based on ElasticSearch such as commonsearch.
NB: Recently, on my side, Google search started to group results for things such as StackOverflow, reddit, Quora and whatnots. Since a couple of weeks, for some reason, Google started to try to present more diverse set of results. Maybe they hope that it will bring back the 1990 era of geocities, or the era before they killed feed readers, eventually improving organically Google search, because Google algorithms can not figure that almost anything about software outside StackOverflow is subpar, and it particular it can not figure what is a good page. Google wants to tackle the problem of centralization...
NB: At some point, searching for
simhash was yielding three mirrors
of wikipedia's page entitled
simhash, those websites were
setup by black hats to capture ad clicks.
NB: I wrote down the above story to be able to drop: Google quacks!
TL;DR: Maybe I will fail. Maybe I will succeed, I worked a lot for that, and made choices.
First, there is always a chance or evil luck that I will fail.
Outside the very top notch high world-class level of self-esteem ego I have, there are several source of confidence:
Babelia seek to eliminate the need for Google, and down the road even deliver better tooling that any wanna-be unicorn... Babelia does not play by the same rules. Babelia will not consider that the user is stupid. Babelia is FLOSS, that alone will be enough to get rid of Google. It will also be part of the fediverse. And further in the future the basis of a fully decentralized Internet at the application level
NB: By the way, I believe Google's search engine is already built around the idea of a federation, except it happens in a controled environment. So, what Babelia will achieve is more difficult that what Google try to do (and arguably sometime succeed).
NB: I do not know why Cliqz failed or even Qwant did not succeed. I may find out.
TL;DR: Star-system is the limit, Facebook and GitHub are next.
The search engine is gathering place, like a library. I like to think Google is the modern incarnation of the Library of Alexandria. There is also Wikimedia projects. I mean, having loads of books without a way to find out the book you are interested in is not useful to have.
In my opinion, a search engine is a fundamental piece in a knowledge construction.
What about wikipedia, wikidata or other wiki stuff, or Facebook, or even GitHub? Those things are more social than a search engine: a registry, a filling cabinet can be automated, whereas decyphering mushrooms caps, and categorizing into species, as of yet, can not be automated so much.
Another fundamental piece in knowledge construction is communication.
To improve upon the establishment, and established practices, my goal is to mimick the world wide web distribution model (easy updates, and the long gone view-source), and getting inspiration from GNU/Linux distributions (network of trust), with the far-reaching perfection and/or minimalism dedication of projects such as suckless, netbsd, or... R7RS.
The idea is to build a desktop environment that stems around a decentralized (publicly distributed) code space where you can stream updates from a network of friends. No, Bill Gates is not your friend.
Yes, the basis of the desktop environment will be a networked programming language. It will not be networked in the sense of Erlang.
Unlike anthropocene desktop environment, it will not try to hide programming from you. It should be painless to share your tweaks, scripts or programs into the public network. The best and still wanna-be feature is easier internationalization (i18n) of code. Footnote: Clickports will be available.
Code is a meme. Where you can share codes, you can share memes. The inverse is not always true. I experimented with a peer-to-peer social network with qadom. While, it is incomplete, it allowed me to figure that it is not impossible, there might be hidden corners, tho.
To summarize: Other aspects of the Internet are more social than a search engine. To deliver the features that can compete with Facebook, GitHub while sticking to demonstrated good pratices such as network of trust, the way forward is to build a desktop environement that is built around a programming language that embody, in world made of diversity, the social nature of software making. Being able to share code as easily as sharing cat memes, and being able to download those memes, after a review, and possibly some tweaks, install them in your own desktop is: the next big thing.
Back to the more prosaic roadmap toward the release of Babelia 1.0:
Milestone 1, Graphical User Interface: The first goal is to build the user interface. For regular users, the mighty input box will be featured with search results (called hits), along a search pad... The operator will be presented how to populate the knowledge base, how to control the crawler, along a dashboard to display health, and sort out moderation requests.
Milestone 2, Boolean-Keyword Search Engine: The second step is to
build the basis of the backend that can achieve boolean-keyword
search with exact-match, and negated keywords, without the support
of the operator
OR. Also, I will create a program to convert
.zim files from kiwix.org into a SQLite LSM
database, add the ability to populate the database with files using
the Web ARChive format nicknamed
.warc. At which point, it will
make sense to package Babelia in NixOS.
Milestone 3, Knowledge Base: in that step the goal is to create the backend that will allow to create the knowledge base that gathers information about known entities and their relatedness. At this point it will be possible to display recognized entities on result page. The main goal being the added possibility to travel to the right of the semantic continuum through hops in relations between known entities and keywords from the query.
Milestone 4, Crawler: The point of this milestone is to build a crawler (also known as spider). Unlike a privateer spider, it does not aim to be very fast. One of the main goal of Babelia is to be one stop solution for your search need. Hence, the main feature of the crawler is to be well integrated with the rest of search engine. It will be possible to subscribe to RSS, and ATOM feeds. Also, it will be handy, to also support firefox bookmarks. It will be possible to ignore URLs with glob patterns. Also, the number of hops outside seed domains will also be configureable to help escape the gilded cage.
Milestone 5, Moderation and Dashboard: Here the goal is to allow the operator of a Babelia instance curate domains with the ability to delete indexed documents, or even purge a domain that were flagged by an user.
A few notes about the design of the whole thing:
Milestone 2, Boolean-Keyword Search Engine: The inverted index will associate words to documents after they are transliterated to ascii. At query time, keywords in the query will be also transliterated to ascii, the least common token will serve as the seed to select the smallest set of documents that contains all the results, those are called candidates. At which point, a non-distributed map-reduce will score document against the query, whie Aho-Corascik is streaming the words from cached candidate documents. Map-reduce will keep top N results, where N might be configurable.
Milestone 3, Knowledge Base: that will be a port of copernic,
vnstore2 will be built on top of the new extension I invented
nstore2 is that it allows to track
changes, and the added benefit of being able to rollback. At query
time depending on the number of bangs
!, the search engine will
follow links between keywords and their related entities, to travel
in the semantic continuum possibly yield more interesting results,
it might also increase false positives.
vnstore2 will also be
useful to add summaries or descriptions to known entities, that
could be linked to their official page or wikipedia page.
Milestone 4, Crawler: Unclear as of yet.
Milestone 5, Dashboard: It is a Create-Read-Update-Delete graphical interface, the backend code looks boring...
You might ask: I am not a coder, what is in there for me? In that case re-read the above, and send me an email with a precise description of what the above is missing.
NB: I plan to deliver before rustaceans start to consider coding software that are not command-line helpers.